AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Difference between autopano pro and giga3/30/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I use Panorama Maker 6, and have been very happy with it. Have used this method for everything from shallow depth of field handheld portraits, to hyperfocal landscapes. That usually only happens if you accept the preset value for scale (10%).Īloysious A Gruntpuddock edited this topic ages ago. Stay away form Autostitch lol its a free download but it makes your pixels the size of a house I only have problems for edit the final panorama in photoshop when the panorama it's great. And if it's more than 300.000 pixels in one line/row you need to save in*. Normaly one of the big problem it's the file output if the shot it's over 30.000 px on each line(or row) you can't save in JPG., next you need to save in PSB/PSD mode. gigapans/107083 (please, don't analyze the wrong sky!) My bigger panorama it's using 1827 shots, you can see it on : My largest pano was just over 51,000 (Autopano Pro) and CorelPaint had no problems loading it. I would like a program that's made just for pano though, and will check out some of the recommendations here. The trick is shooting manually and get clean shots for it to stitch. I've done files that print 10' x 24" and they look great. :)Īdobe Photoshop Elements 9 is easy to use and seems to work well.ĬS5 does good panorama stitching, as does CS4 for that matter. The panorama I'm talking about : other panoramas (often with remarks about the technique used in the description or in the comments) : my experiments can help you guys. In the end, it's a long process, but it's fun to test the limits of the software you're using :) So I might use one day Hugin to use its perspective correction capabilities (more straightforward than the one in PS to my taste). The only problem with this technique is that the end result is a bit wavy. Once all those "little" panos made, I selected al the flattened ones to make the final image. So, I made several smaller panoramas (10-20 files each if I remember well), saved them as PSD files and also as flattened PSDs. I used Photoshop in that case because is has the PSB (photoshop big) file format for when you can't save a regular PSD file. ![]() I once made a +10Gb panorama with photoshop, I wanted to try a big one made from a lot of full-res tiff files (70Mb each). So too many files, or too big files may halt the stitching at some point. One thing to note though : be it Hugin or probably Photoshop, such software seems to always convert any file to TIFF. I was so impressed, I even bought the upgrade to 2.0!įree (libre) software, it made wonders with my panoramas :) Tried the Gigapan software (before they made it private) and the Microsoft version, but my heart belongs to AP. I prefer free software whenever I can get it but have never regretted finally going for Autopano Pro 1.0. I stopped using Microsoft ICE once I saw what a better job PhotoShop CS5 did. I have used Photoshop with great success with panos of 180 images. It's also useful as it breaks up the stitching process, giving the user more control – and creative control – over stitching. I have a very in depth tutorial for Photoshop. Instinctive humor edited this topic ages ago. Now the challenge are going to be the printer & driver. Beginning in CS2, Adobe released a new file format specification for files of this magnitude It seems newer CS versions have raised that limit The maximum image size Photoshop CS can handle is 300,000 by 300,000 pixels! That's a big print. Just in case someone thinks that we Elements folks are getting a bad deal on the max file size and pixel dimensions.the same limits apply to big sibling Photoshop 7. This restriction places limits on the print size and resolution available to an image. Other tools also have 16bit integer limitation (either 32767 or 65535) Photoshop Elements supports a maximum file size of 2 GB and maximum pixel dimensions of 30,000 by 30,000 pixels per image. PS : The limits I saw, especially in printing, started when the longest edge exceeded 32768 pixels. Ps does a good job on loading and handling large images (100MP:ish), but slow it is. I have not had any problems in this regard, running XP in 2GB RAM since long. but in any case I suspect that ptgui would churn it anyhow. Unless you wish to have a huge end result you might wish to reduce the size of those photos some. Of course the speed at which it'll work will depend very much on the capabilities of your PC.Īutopano pro (or giga) is doing a good job with large panoramas. What other software is good for this kind of pano please? I'm having trouble stitching 130 files (2.39Gb). ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |